ASSIGNMENT 1 complete in 12 hours
Anonymous

Question Description


Assignment 1: Project Paper – Comparative Essay
Due Week 4 and worth 190 points

For this assignment, you’re going to compare two rulers. Select a group of either two male rulers or two female rulers from different cultures using the following list:

  • Ancient Male Rulers: Ramses II, Shihuangdi, Constantine, Ashoka, Pericles, or Charlemagne
  • Ancient Female Rulers: Compare Tang Empress Wu Zetian (Chinese Culture) with either the Pharaoh Cleopatra (Egypt Culture) or the Pharaoh Hatshepsut (Egypt Culture)
    • Note: Empress Wu Zetian is also known as Empress Wu or as Wu Zhao

Write a 750-1000 word essay where you:

  1. Paragraph 1: Establish a clear thesis about your chosen subjects. Include the dates in which each lived and ruled, and add 2-3 sentences on the reason for each choice.
  2. Paragraph 2: Compare 2 ways your choices are similar.
    1. You may compare their family background, leadership styles, accomplishments, victories, losses, or impact of the culture in which each lived.
  3. Paragraph 3: Compare 2 ways your choices are different.
    1. You may compare their family background, leadership styles, accomplishments, victories, losses, or impact of the culture in which each lived.
  4. Paragraph 4: Compare 2 ways your choices' cultures are different.
    1. You may compare their cultural differences in terms of government structure, religion, natural resources, traditions, or goods and services.
  5. Paragraph 5: In a concluding paragraph, summarize 2 things you learned about leadership styles or cultures then compared to leadership styles or cultures today.
  6. References: Include a reference page that identifies at least 3 references.
    1. The class text may be included in the list of 3 or more.
    2. In-text citations are required when paraphrasing or quoting another source.
  7. Formatting and Writing Standards: Align your formatting to the Strayer University Writing Standards. View the: Strayer University Writing Standards (SWS) Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
    Points: 190Assignment 1: Project Paper Comparative Essay
    CriteriaUnacceptable0% FMeets Minimum Expectations65% DFair75% CProficient85% BExemplary100% A
    1. Establish a clear thesis that addresses the stated elements.Weight: 20%Did not submit or incompletely established a thesis that addressed the stated elements.Insufficiently established a thesis that addressed the stated elements.Partially established a thesis that addressed the stated elements.Satisfactorily established a clear thesis that addressed the stated elements.Thoroughly established a clear thesis and that addressed the stated elements.
    2. Provide adequate information, specific examples, and details which support the points of comparison (i.e., STEPS 3, 4, and 5) and the paper overall.Weight: 35%Did not submit or incompletely provided adequate information, specific examples, and details which support the points of comparison and the paper overall.Insufficiently provided adequate information, specific examples, and details which support the points of comparison and the paper overall.Partially provided adequate information, specific examples, and details which support the points of comparison and the paper overall.Satisfactorily provided information, specific examples, and details which support the points of comparison and the paper overall.Thoroughly provided information, specific examples, and details which support the points of comparison and the paper overall.
    3. Provide coherent organization of the points of comparison (i.e., STEPS 3, 4, and 5) and the paper overall.Weight: 20%Did not submit or incompletely provided coherent organization of the points of comparison and the paper overall.Insufficiently provided coherent organization of the points of comparison and the paper overall.Partially provided coherent organization of the points of comparison and the paper overall.Satisfactorily provided coherent organization of the points of comparison and the paper overall.Thoroughly provided coherent organization of the points of comparison and the paper overall.
    4. Three (3) references minimum (including class text); Reference qualityWeight: 5%No references providedDoes not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.Meets number of required references; some references poor quality choices.Meets or exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
    5. Follows writing standards.
    Meets page minimums. Weight: 20%
    Followed few to no writing standards.
    Did not meet page minimums.
    Followed few writing standards.
    May not have met page minimums.
    Followed some writing standards.
    May not have met page minimums.
    Followed most writing standards.
    Met page minimums.
    Followed all writing standards.
    Met page minimums.

Final Answer

Here we go, let me know if you need any correction or revision??

Running head: COMPARISON OF RAMSES II AND CHARLEMAGNE

Comparison of Ramses II and Charlemagne
Name:
Institution:

1

COMPARISON OF RAMSES II AND CHARLEMAGNE

2

Comparison of Ramses II and Charlemagne
Great leaders and rulers have, over the years, employed different leadership techniques.
The techniques have always been responsible for their successes or failure. We have heard and
read of great dictators, diplomats among others. Therefore, this paper aims to compare two great
leaders, Ramses II and Charlemagne. Their similarities and differences will be discussed
hereinafter a brief history of their lives. Discussed in this paper will also be ways in
which the cultures of the two leaders differed. Ramses II was an Egyptian king with the
second-longest reign in the history of the country (1279–13 BCE) (Fitzgerald, 2009). Also
known as Ramses the Great, served as the 3 rd king of the 19 th dynasty (Fitzgerald, 2009).
He was keen on restoring Egyptian dominance in Asia. His father, Seti, played an
essential role in his early life, which made him conversant with war and tactics required
in leadership. He used to accompany his father during his campaigns which made him
also conversant with territories. Charlemagne als...

Ryansam (1298)
University of Virginia

Anonymous
The tutor managed to follow the requirements for my assignment and helped me understand the concepts on it.

Anonymous
The tutor was knowledgeable, will be using the service again.

Anonymous
Awesome quality of the tutor. They were helpful and accommodating given my needs.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors

星空影院-星空影院电视免费播放-星空影院a片在线播放